Legislative Affairs Update - February 21, 2012 The Cargo Cut Out fix will be a fairly lengthy process. Michael Robbins (ALPA National Director of Government Affairs) and I briefed the MEC last week as to the road ahead to have Cargo Carriers required to participate in the FAR 117.
February 21
February 21, 2012
The Cargo Cut Out fix will be a fairly lengthy process. Michael Robbins (ALPA
National Director of Government Affairs) and I briefed the MEC last week as to
the road ahead to have Cargo Carriers required to participate in the FAR 117.
The plan includes getting language for a standalone bill that would require
everyone’s participation in FAR 117 rules. That process is already in the works.
The next step is to get bipartisan support for that bill. To date, we have
already had close to 200 meetings to engender support and educate members of
Congress as to the importance of one level of safety and how it actually affects
the flying public. The support has been very strong and everyone gets it. There
will be other opportunities to “Educate Congress and the Flying public” as we
move forward.
Unfortunately, in today’s “Do Nothing Congress” it will be a challenge to see
anything really passed in the near term. Couple that with the fact that it is an
election year, where no one steps out to take a risk, explains the concept of
lengthy process. The strategy is to add this cargo language to a bill that is
actually moving and one that needs to be passed. To make that happen, we will
need the support from leadership in both houses. Due to the pending IPA
litigation, congressional leaders have indicated that they will not address
anything that is in the courts. Therein lies the conundrum of DC. That is the
long-range plan for the cargo cut out.
The biggest and most egregious challenge in Washington DC is the President’s
Budget that came out over a week ago. Even though this budget is DOA (dead on
arrival), we are extremely furious that the FFDO (Federal Flight Deck) program
was cut in half in the Fiscal 2013 budget. This is evidence that Washington
again is willing to put aircraft, their crews and passengers at risk because of
economic considerations. The Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program is the
most cost-effective means of aviation security and is in fact the last line of
defense in the aircraft, with officers often paying more out-of-pocket to
participate in the program than the government pays to fund the position. It
costs the federal government a meager $15 per FFDO flight.
Even though the President’s budget will not become a reality, it is disturbing
that the Homeland Security Administration is playing their cards face up in an
effort to eradicate the FFDO program. We will continue the education campaign on
the Hill for the FFDO program. We will be meeting with the FAMS and TSA next
week. We are working in conjunction with other pilot unions and organizations to
make sure that this program is protected. In actuality the FFDO budget should be
doubled. For the FFDO’s in our FedEx pilot group, take a look at
www.FFDOA.org.
It is a great organization that supports the FFDOs and the program.
9/11 occurred because 8 pilots were killed without
the means to defend themselves. The world was forever changed and trillions of
dollars were spent because of this horrific event. FFDOs serve as the last line
of defense on an aircraft. This program needs to be protected and enhanced. It
is the most cost effective program our government has.
We will keep you posted as to progress and event outcomes. You are key to the
legislative process in helping control our future. Thank you in advance for your
help and support.
Fraternally,
Captain Fred Eissler
FDX Legislative Affairs Committee Chairman
